Solo exhibition by Eddie Hara
In-Between Contingencies – In the Face of the Flowing Time
The year 2017 is a special one for Eddie Hara, at least for two reasons. The first one relates to
his current status as an “immigrant”.
It is exactly twenty years ago that Hara decided to move to Europe; to live and work in Basel,
Switzerland. It wasn’t an easy decision in his life. At that time his reputation in Indonesia was
rising as a young artist who had begun to be involved in big exhibitions, both in the country and
abroad. Several of his fellow artists questioned his decision. They believed that living abroad
would risk the “cultural relevance” of his works to his homeland, as well as potentially harm his
bright career.
Indeed, it was personal considerations that became the reasons behind his move, especially his
marriage with Catherine Maeder, the mother of his two sons, Mimmo and Nestor. But more than that, it
was also influenced by a more underlying outlook of life. Since early on, Hara was not an artist who
naively believes in rigid ties between cultural values and one’s birth place or one’s national
identity. His works have always been a clue. Instead of immersing himself in the various discourses
of “Indonesian-ness” in the local art world, since the end of 1980s he has intentionally opened
himself toward “outside” influences. Since those years, too, he has traveled abroad for exhibitions,
residence programs, and academic studies. It was such experiences of being an itinerant artist that,
I believe, crucially formed his flexible attitude in viewing cultural differences.
Observers discussed the emergence of Hara’s works as an important phenomenon in the Indonesian art
in the beginning of 1990s. Together with his compatriot, Heri Dono, Hara appeared with works that
deviated from the predominant trend. Since the end of 1980s, he has developed a visual style based
on a detailed study over children’s drawings and popular comic characters. When his peers in campus
were still grappling with “classic” approaches, especially surrealism and expressivism, in
Yogyakarta, Hara came up with “naïve” styled paintings. He was already starting to present imaginary
creatures or characters whose anatomy resembles mutation or transplantation rather than stylization
of forms. Brushes of bright and merry colors have always appeared on his canvases. There were no
mystical or local spiritual themes. Instead he presented actual, social daily issues.
The creatures in Hara’s paintings overall represent the ambiguity of human nature and social norms
or values. Looking at a glance like fish or other nautical creatures, mammals, dolls, crowns, robots
or cyborgs, they often come with open mouths; rows of teeth at the front as if laughing. But their
hands often grip a weapon, a sort of blade, sword or gun. Their ambiguous expressions represent the
ever-contradicting and paradoxical sides of humans. Luminous eyes alter laugh into sinister sneer.
Angels and demons merge together in one physique. Lately Hara has also been presenting more and more
icons identical to death or violence, such as skulls and fanged masks, with bright and cheerful
colors. Another important element in Hara’s works is texts in-between the drawings. Sometimes those
are amusing, random phrases, but at some other times they guide us to his real intention: to express
comments, criticisms, satire, or mere traces of verbal expressions lashing out in anger.
Looking at those hybrid, distorted creatures’ anatomy in his paintings, once I asked whether such
images were the result of Javanese wayang influence. Rather than instantly admitting it, Hara told
me about the similarity of wayang characters and those of the cartoon world, such as Mickey Mouse,
Alice in Alice in Wonderland, and Batman, who had been alive in his imagination during his teenage,
far before he moved to Europe. This is an interesting statement in regard to the Indonesian art
development that has long been under the shadow of fanaticism of “locality” or “Indonesian-ness”.
Hara’s statement explains why his works merited a lot of talks in the early 1990s. He represents an
emergence of Indonesian new artists who at that time refused to work according to the dictating,
narrow “cultural chauvinism”. Not only absorbing stylistic influences of Dada, Fluxus and art brutart brut,
Hara also admits being influenced by punk music, heavy metal music and street art (graffiti). He
draws inspirations from a subcultural spirit that is still very much rebellious but expressed in far
more casual ways.
Twenty years after he moved to Basel, we know how, as an artist, he still has an intact, flourishing
reputation in Indonesia. His career as an Indonesian artist living in Europe seems to emphasize how
connections between “cultural values” and a space or a place is basically contingent—arbitrary even.
To be an “Indonesian artist”, for Eddie Hara, doesn’t mean to live and work in Indonesia.
Some might see that his career is part of a general phenomenon in step with the latest
characteristics of the global contemporary art after 2000s in which art production, distribution and
consumption (through exhibition, collection, auction etc) can easily cross geographical borders
these days. However, I believe that, in fact, cosmopolitanism is something inherently natural in
Hara’s life, which also shapes him as an artist.
The year 2017 is also special for him as it marks his sixtieth birthday—the title of this solo
exhibition, SWEER (& sour) SIXTY!SWEER (& sour) SIXTY! indicates the significance of the moment to him. But this
exhibition, of course, is not just a celebration of a painter’s birthday. Our attention to someone’s
age is a testimony to how the life of modern humans is quantified by a chronological time unit
(birth year – death year). Our perception often hinges too much on numbers used to quantify, instead
of quality. We often forget that a birthday is basically a memento of what we do in life: What have
we done as a mortal being in the face of the flowing time?
Learning about Eddie Hara practically from readings and talks in short meetings, I would like to
nevertheless weave this short article from deep impressions about his works and figure. I wouldn’t
hesitate to say that his charisma lies in his humbleness and sincere friendliness. He is always
nonchalant and likely to amuse in daily interactions; never distances himself from anyone, including
a much younger generation of artists. He never patronizes or acts in too formal ways as a deeply
seasoned senior.
Looking up to his figure as an artist, I truly appreciate how he puts art as the way of
life—especially painting. His spirit seems to be in contrast with his age. He maintains until today
a painting method that rarely rests on a sketch or design. His painting process can be likened to an
opening of a Pandora box, in which myriad images of objects, texts, planes, lines, dots, melts and
brushes of colors seem to burst or spill over, filling an entire canvas. He does keep doodles of
sketches in a drawing book that he carries whenever he goes. But, in his process, those sketches
never transform themselves fully into paintings. He also differs from “expressionist” artists who
rely on revelation before drawing, working with great discipline and spending several hours in
studio every day as much as he can.
SWEET (& sour) SIXTY! does not reflect at all a typical, stagnant “old artist” generation’s
exhibition. On the contrary, this exhibition might represent the golden age of Eddie Hara. For
instance, this time he is presenting a number of paintings bigger in size than the ones he
previously made. Look at, for example, Bobo-bobo Siang (2016-2017) and Its. Its my Baby (2015-2017)
stretching more than 2 x 3 meters. Not only trying something new, he has also been exploiting the
spacious exhibition hall at the Nadi Gallery, which he transformed to a temporary studio during his
residence in Jakarta. In this exhibition, there are several works in embroideries, as well as
three-dimensional objects from acrylic sheets that he created with the help of Biantoro Santoso. It
is all an evidence of how Eddie Hara’s spirit of experimentation with new media and materials knows
no halt.
This short note may not be the best present, but I would like to end it with a most sincere wish:
Happy Birthday, Mas Eddie!
Agung Hujatnikajennong
Eddie Hara
Bobo Bobo Siang, 2016-2017
Acrylic on canvas
222 x 318 cm
Eddie Hara
Buaya Darat #1, 2017
Plexi glass, LED light
196 x 143.5 x 93.5 cm
Eddie Hara
Buaya Darat #2, 2017
Plexi glass, polyurethane paint
185 x 114 x 64 cm
Eddie Hara
Come and Play With Us!, 2017
Handmade embroidery
127 x 135 cm
Eddie Hara
Cosmic Serpent, 2017
Handmade embroidery
121 x 97 cm (unique edition)
Eddie Hara
Fly Birdie Fly, 2017
Plexi glass, LED light
90 x 104 x 43 cm
Eddie Hara
Holy Man and His Circus of Life, 2017
Acrylic on canvas
150 x 200 cm
Eddie Hara
I`m Not in the Mood to Dance (Pure, Raw, Honet, Diabolic), 2014
Acrylic on canvas
200 X 150 cm
Eddie Hara
It’s, It’s My Baby!, 2015-2017
Acrylic on canvas
220 x 316 cm
Eddie Hara
Joyful Rites of Spring I, 2017
Acrylic on canvas
111 x 88 cm
Eddie Hara
Joyful Rites of Spring II, 2017
Acrylic on canvas
111 x 88 cm
Eddie Hara
Long Eared Creatures Don’t Say Goodnight, 2017
Acrylic on canvas
140 x 100 cm
Eddie Hara
Make West Jakarta Great Again (From 4057 to 11610), 2017
Acrylic marking pen on canvas
100 x 300 cm (triptych)
Eddie Hara
Mickey Mouse Kobongan, 2017
Plexi glass LED light
120 x 115 x 45 cm
Eddie Hara
Neither Fluxus Nor Artbrut, 2017
Acrylic on canvas
100 x 180 cm
Eddie Hara
Nocturnal Serenade, 2017
Handmade carpet
172 x 250 cm (unique edition)
Eddie Hara
Painting No. 5818159 (We Do Not Belong To This High F_kin Art Society), 2014
Acrylic on canvas
180 x 200 cm (diptych)
Eddie Hara
Rush Rush to the Wild Side, 2011-2017
Acrylic on canvas
150 x 240 cm (diptych)
Eddie Hara
This is (Almost) Street Art, 2017
Digital print, acrylic and handmade embroidery on canvas
100 x 150 cm
Eddie Hara
This is Not Street Art, 2017
Digital print, acrylic and handmade embroidery on canvas
100 x 150 cm
Eddie Hara
Trashy Arty Farty, 2017
Handmade carpet
202 x 270 cm (unique edition)